On Tue, May 16, 2006 2:07 am, Phil Driscoll wrote: > On Tuesday 16 May 2006 01:04, Lukas Smith wrote: >> That being said .. if there are any additions people have to give >> better >> guidelines for RM's please drop a comment at the following address: >> http://oss.backendmedia.com/ReleaseChecklist > > I've just added the following comment, which addresses part of the > problem: > -------------------- > Somewhere between the RC and the release, the release manager should > receive email confirmation from a number of volunteers that the RC has > been tested not only with 'make test', but on real world applications > such > as the volunteers' own code and high profile applications such as > phpMyAdmin, SquirrelMail and so on. > > The RC should not become a release until such confirmation is > received. > -------------------- > > I hereby volunteer to do my code, phpMyAdmin and SquirrelMail for php5 > RCs. > > Clearly, for this to have maximum impact we need to cover as many > applications, platforms and SAPIs as possible.
Would it be worth having a checklist of "must-have" software? It's easy to see something big getting missed just because "Joe" is on vacation or too busy to test, and everybody knows "Joe" is gonna test it... -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php