On Tue, May 16, 2006 2:07 am, Phil Driscoll wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 01:04, Lukas Smith wrote:
>> That being said .. if there are any additions people have to give
>> better
>> guidelines for RM's please drop a comment at the following address:
>> http://oss.backendmedia.com/ReleaseChecklist
>
> I've just added the following comment, which addresses part of the
> problem:
> --------------------
> Somewhere between the RC and the release, the release manager should
> receive email confirmation from a number of volunteers that the RC has
> been tested not only with 'make test', but on real world applications
> such
> as the volunteers' own code and high profile applications such as
> phpMyAdmin, SquirrelMail and so on.
>
> The RC should not become a release until such confirmation is
> received.
> --------------------
>
> I hereby volunteer to do my code, phpMyAdmin and SquirrelMail for php5
> RCs.
>
> Clearly, for this to have maximum impact we need to cover as many
> applications, platforms and SAPIs as possible.

Would it be worth having a checklist of "must-have" software?

It's easy to see something big getting missed just because "Joe" is on
vacation or too busy to test, and everybody knows "Joe" is gonna test
it...

-- 
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to