Hello, On 8/15/06, Matt W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Pierre,I will go ahead and enter a Bug report for this in a bit ('cause there's definitely a bug), just so it's in the official place (preferred, I guess?) and doesn't keep going here on the list. :-)
Please don't. I have no more ways or words to explain you what needs to be done.... Please ask me if you still don't get it.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Pierre" Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 > Hello, > > > While I agree the change should be carefully reviewed, I must wonder > > why the millions upon millions of lines of code in 4.x are going to be > > ignored here... > > > > What rationale is there for breaking the BC? > > > > Obviously you think it should be broken -- I just don't understand why... > > I did not say it should be broken. All I said (and confirmed by > Andrei) is that we should first sit down and figure out what, how and > when we can/should change something. It seems to me as the sanest > attitude given the insane amount of senseless changes. > > There is no need to push a patch just to bring another entry to this > changelog. As I already suggested, we can work together on a proposal > and bring it to a conclusion.
Just to be sure, you are just talking about the array_count_values() function and not the is_numeric... stuff?
No, I'm talking about __all__ cases :-). This function or the array keys in general is only one issue, there is some more. Which part of "We need to sit down and come up with a proposal?" did you not understand? seriously? --Pierre -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
