Should be non-fatal. IMO, we shouldn't even be using up CPU cycles to check this; use a compiled language for that kind of safety.
--Wez. On 10/6/06, Edin Kadribasic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The vote is should OO strictness (fatal error on changing function arguments in derived classes in this case) be removed or kept. Edin Wez Furlong wrote: > Just a lame ass late-to-the-show comment... I've been out of touch and > this mini thread gives no indication what the vote is about. > > Can we try to use more descriptive subjects going forward, thanks! > > --Wez. > > On 10/5/06, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Michael Wallner wrote: >> >> > 3, 2 [+1] (remove) Mike, Pierre, Edin (Robert Cummings, >> Bertrand Gugger) >> > 1, 1 [+0] (nonfatal) Zeev (Richard Lynch) >> > 3, 0 [-1] (leave) Sebastian, Ilia, Derick >> >> BTW I think even if Marcus has not voted yet he is sure to be in the >> leave as in CVS camp :) >> >> regards, >> Lukas >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> >
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
