On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 08:48:31PM -0400, Wez Furlong wrote:
> Updated patch at http://pastebin.ca/400952
This is interesting. I'm not sure I'll ever use it (I prefer named
functions), but it's a purely optional and folks seem to want
something like this.
One comment on the patch itself:
static unsigned int anon_count;
I think you should provide an initial value (0?) for this static
counter. Also, you should protect against wrap-around (which, while
improbably, is possible).
Alternatively, you could change the anonymous function naming scheme
to something like __zend_anon_FILE_LINE_COLUMN, but that could be an
unnecessary waste of string memory.
--
Jon Parise (jon of php.net) :: The PHP Project (http://www.php.net/)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
