On 05/15/2007 08:52 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
That said, I'm happy with both func_b.phpt and func_basic.phpt (and even
009.phpt) =)
We just need more tests, doesn't matter what their names look like.
I think it does. If one needs to see which tests there are or are there
any tests that test particular thing or inspect certain aspects of a
functionality, navigating a maze of func_01234.phpt, all alike, is a
nightmare. Of course, I could open all of them one by one and remember
which one does what - that is if I were a being with unlimited lifespan,
infallible memory and never felt bored - but for regular human it's a
painful experience.
Well, I'm pretty sure regular humans know how to run `find . -name "*.phpt" | xargs
grep "func`.
So when writing a new tests it would be very good to
give them names that make sense, it doesn't cost anything and helps
people. Renaming old ones might be somewhat boring task, so not sure
anybody ever would do that...
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
