Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 13:57 +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Rasmus,
the limitations given here and very good explained should imo stay. They
should because that is not only easier to understand and easier for anything
that has to deal with it like opcode caches and whatnot but also adhrers to
the good old KISS approach of PHP.
That said, instead of changing the current implementation every day we
should step back a bit and first find a consensus whether we want anything
more or even anything less than what we currently have.
My personal feeling is that we should stick to one name binding per file.
And we should do so without braces (if I want it complex I just take a more
complex language).
While I agree with the one namespace per file camp I think your above
argument "if I want it complex I just take a more complex language" is
akin to saying "If I want it OOP I'll take a more OOP language". I'm
sure you'll agree that's not a very good argument.
Make as much hard but common stuff easy, keep the easy stuff easy and
make the hard stuff possible. Could this be our mantra?
regards,
Lukas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
