On Feb 19, 2008 2:09 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I really like what Stefan did here with his traits RFC. Very solid > work, even if there are still some people not convinced if they want > this feature in, I have seen little complaints about the way this > proposal was made. Quite the contrary actually. I would like this kind > of detailed thought to become more the norm. Even if at the very > beginning of an idea this quality may not be immediately attainable, > it should be the goal. So for every idea we should have at least > someone who tries to bring the proposal to this kind of level as the > discussions progress.
Most definitely, thanks to Stefan for this. I have rarely seen such RFC in PHP lately. This is.. wow, from simple example to a bit more complex and real life examples, simple texts, the reason why we need this and a bit more about MI. The external links to further readings on the subject are great and the thesis is even better (A bit long but very interesting). I think this can make a lot of good to PHP's RFC process if handled correctly. Let's just hope we do it correctly :) > > For this proposal I would hope that it would be put on some host we > can trust to not disappear and be updated with the feedback. I am > still dreaming of a php.net wiki for this kind of stuff. If interested > I do of course offer wiki.pooteeweet.org to host these RFC's for the > time being. Using php.net/reST has the draw back of requiring > cvs.php.net karma for maintenance, which would be problematic for new > comers, unless we can do karma on a per file level for this? Wiki is such a great idea, what were the (political?) reasons for not having it ? No one to maintain it ? > > regards, > Lukas > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- David, Re-read what you are replying. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php