On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:51 AM, John Carter -X (johncart - PolicyApp Ltd at Cisco) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The article explicitly mentions OOP interfaces in a few languages. my bad. > But > the article, or for that matter any formal definition of an interface > isn't really what I asked about: > > My question was simply: why can't interfaces have properties? when you say properties, do you mean a particular set of methods map to a particular instance variable, as getters and setters (i saw that definition from Sebastian earlier)? if thats the case than interfaces cant have properties because they require instance variables. -nathan
