Hi!
I'm not sure to like the idea. I'm not a fan of OO strictness but I'd
to agree with Marcus, I do not expect a reference from an overrided
How can you "not expect reference"? I.e. which code that worked
previously wouldn't work now?
__get. There is also the problem with internal classes, if I'm not
mistaken.
Which problem? Could you elaborate?
I meant set by reference. Is it not the same problem?
class foo {function __set($key, &$value) {}} >> fatal error
Ah, I see what you mean. But I'm not sure __set has this semantics now
anyway - unless we'd support it with $a->foo =& $bar somehow, but right
now we don't.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
