On 6/10/10 8:53 AM, Tjerk Anne Meesters wrote: > All "fpm" workers would be called using the same function name (e.g. > "runphp"). This allows you to reuse a gearmand instance for other > workers too.
I don't think we would need to require that. Obviously you could build your Gearman worker such that it registers "runphp" and has a big switch in it to run various types of jobs and fpm would just need to manage a single pool of workers. But, assuming fpm could manage multiple pools, I don't see the problem with having different types of workers. -Rasmus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php