Hi Dmitry, 2010/11/29 Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com>
> Hi Felipe, > I'm wondered it works out of the box with so small patches :) > > However, both patches introduce new parser conflicts and it would be grate > to avoid them. > > I will check if there is any way to avoid it. > Also the patches need to be checked for memory leaks in case of exceptions > thrown from constructor and chained function(s). > Yes, I already did several tests to check this. > It also probably makes sense to add array deference chaining e.g. new > Foo()[] (just for language consistency). > > Hmm, looks good to me. :) Thanks. -- Regards, Felipe Pena
