On 08.06.2011, at 00:38, dukeofgaming wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2011-06-07, dukeofgaming <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 for "callable", it is really more consistent. >> >> I was actually agreeing With David and Stas that "callback" was more >> consistent, and casting my vote for that. > > Oh. But then, shouldn't is_callable be deprecated for a more consistently > named is_callback?
No, because is_callable() also performs visibility checks. Which of course begs the question... should the type hint do the same? David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
