Stas, On the "Remove magic quotes" there seems to be an overwhelming support from PHP Core and the community for removing it. Any reason there is no definitive decision on the topic?
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > Hi! > > Here are the results of the votes. I've split them into "PHP Group" - people > that have write access to the PHP code, based on SVN karma algorithm, and > "Community" - all the rest. Here it goes: > > Declare PHP/php as namespace reserved for PHP internals > -------------------------------------------------------- > Votes: 57 total, 20 PHP Core, 37 community > For option PHP: PHP group support: 15 (75%), community: 28 (75%) > For option php: PHP group support: 14 (70%), community: 26 (70%) > > This is clearly accepted. As it's docs only change, let's update the docs > accordingly. > 3 people from PHP group voted against: auroraeosrose,cataphract,kalle. It'd > be interesting to know why, didn't hear anything on the list AFAIR. > > Make primitive types (string, bool, int, etc.) reserved words > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Removed for BC reasons, so no reason to count vote results. > > Add E_STRICT to E_ALL > --------------------- > Votes: 58 total, 23 PHP Core, 35 community > > Every single voter supported it, nuff said. > > Add option to disable POST data processing > ------------------------------------------ > Votes: 58 total, 23 PHP Core, 35 community > > Again, accepted unanimously. > > Support binary notation (0b1010101) > ------------------------------------ > Votes: 56 total, 21 PHP Core, 35 community > > Unanimous again! > > Remove magic quotes > -------------------- > Votes: 54 total, 21 PHP Core, 33 community > For removal: PHP group support: 18 (85%), community: 32 (96%) > > Again, 3 people voted against: derick,salathe,zeev. Any comments? > > Array short syntax > ------------------- > Votes: 61 total, 23 PHP Core, 38 community > First option (just brackets): PHP group support: 15 (65%), community: 28 > (73%) > Second option (brackets and colons): PHP group support: 2 (8%), community: 7 > (18%) > Against both: PHP group support: 6 (26%), community: 3 (7%) > > I think we can deem the first option passed, but not the second one. > > Callable type check > ------------------- > Votes: 51 total, 21 PHP Core, 30 community > For callable: PHP group support: 13 (61%), community: 21 (70%) > For callback: PHP group support: 8 (38%), community: 10 (33%) > Against both: PHP group support: 5 (23%), community: 1 (03%) > > We have clear majority here for implementing it, but preference on the name > is less clear. Personally, I strongly urge that proposer would consider not > to add another mess in our documentation and call it what it was always > called in our docs. Otherwise, I guess documentation team should go and fix > all our docs to say "callable" now. > > Change rebinding behavior of closures > ------------------------------------- > Votes: 33 total, 10 PHP Core, 23 community > PHP group support: 10 (100%), community: 22 (95%) > > Votes for this one are sparse, but unanimously in support. If we have no BC > issues there, it's in. > > foreach adds list support > -------------------------- > Votes: 32 total, 11 PHP Core, 21 community > For: PHP group support: 1 (9%), community: 8 (38%) > > Rejected, at least for 5.4, sorry. > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
