hi, I don't remember a change about it and did not check the log yet. Would you mind to write here how it is broken please? It could help the discussions :)
But yes, if it has changed in an incompatible way, I'd to go with a revert as well. Cheers, On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 11:13 AM, André Rømcke <a...@ez.no> wrote: > Hi, > > > > a bit late to the party maybe, but why was REQUEST_TIME broken in 5.4 > instead of adding a new parameter? (like REQUEST_MICROTIME) > Is the Release Process not followed yet? > > > - x.y.z to x.y+1.z > - (...) > - Backward compatibility must be kept > > ( https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess ) > > > It is not a big deal (we are used to it), but it does break a couple of > things in for instance eZ Publish & Zeta Components which will by the > nature of things not be fixed before the next release. > Most customers will hopefully make sure the version of the software they > are using is tested/certified for php 5.4 before upgrading, but from > experience, some will not. > > > Other then that, happy xmas! -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
