Scroll down a bit; he gets into valid points about the == operator, for instance. It's not a useless post. He does cite too many things that he has to follow up himself by saying "this was fixed in PHP 5.x.y." If it was fixed, why is it on your laundry list still?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Adir Kuhn <adirk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> today I read this post, I think that some points are valid, follow the link >> for >> you guys >> >> http://me.veekun.com/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/ > > Sorry but this list is not a SEO booster. Thanks for your understanding, > > PS: This blog brings zero thing new, got many wrong facts and only > repeats what have been said for over a decade about parameters order. > Not sure how one can have so much free time in his hand to write such > useless things. > > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- Tom Boutell P'unk Avenue 215 755 1330 punkave.com window.punkave.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
