> My feeling is that either more complex expressions for operators with an > implicit "isset" or "!empty" shouldn't work, or that they should cause > notices.
That's exactly why I think we're going in the wrong direction by speaking of an "alternate ternary" operator. You're saying the basic ternary is (expr1) ? (expr2) : (expr3) But the only notice-free alternate is (var) ?? (expr2) : (expr3) This alternate is just going to cause confusion as it has a different, more limited signature. -- S. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
