On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Andrew Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote:
> On 21/08/12 22:43, Levi Morrison wrote:
>>
>> There is a reason to have a callable provided: custom comparison.
>> Other array functions solve this by providing a `u` alternative:
>>
>> `int array_udelete(&$array, $value, bool function($value, $key))`
>>
>> Let's not deviate from established array naming conventions.  (Yasuo,
>> I'm looking at you)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Levi Morrison
>
> Yeah, this looks like a good solution and we have the best of both worlds.
>
> We get int array_delete(&$array, $value, $strict=TRUE); and int
> array_udelete(&$array, $value, $callback=bool function ($value $key));
>
> :)
>
>

I'll still vote no on the RFC if it ever comes to it :)

I'm only contributing here because I don't want pure madness to ever
come to a vote when I'm absent and get voted in . . .

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to