On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > And if it's impossible to match behavior of the existing parser - do I > get it right that the proposed idea is to actually break real code that > people run now in PHP because it was too hard to parse for people that > write add-on tools to PHP? Somehow it does not sound like a good idea. > If we have doubt that we can match the existing PHP behavior then the > idea of changing parser becomes even less appealing, because for 99% of > PHP users it would be pure downside without upsides. The users don't > care if the parser is complex, they care if their code runs.
The whole thing obviously only makes sense if we can retain full syntax compatibility. If we have to break syntax, then this is a no-go anyway. But I'm fairly certain that we indeed can keep full compatibility. I implemented an AST-emitting PHP parser in PHP and am fairly sure that it is compatible with any PHP 5.4 source code. I don't see issues from this side. Nikita -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
