On 12/10/12 8:32 AM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 14:10 +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
There was no consensus, I am not sure where you get the idea.
By spending the time to go through the thread, taking the opinions
stated there, filtering out side discussions (like LTS based release
models etc) evaluating it (partly subjective) and summarizing it as in
the mail starting this thread.
However, we discussed to wait a bit before proposing the RFC to
clearly and cleanly define the EOL of 5.3.
Your message saying "5.4 was released on March, 1st. That's why I asked
this question now while it should have been done before." which is one
of the last from the thread doesnt' sound like delaying for additional
3/4 years for a decision.
I will clean up this RFC and call for vote later this week (most
likely tomorrow). It is very important to follow this step instead of
simply say, hey, I will go down this way because I like it ;-)
feel free to do what you want.
The delay is way too short for 3rd parties to adapt.
If people can provide reasons to extend it I'm open to hear those.
johannes
As a data point, Drupal 8 is slated to target PHP 5.3. Probably 5.3.10
and up, with release targeted in the second half of 2013. That is based
primarily on our investigation into what is actually shipping in Linux
distributions, and what the market looks like it will probably look like.
There's still plenty of places deploying Drupal on PHP 5.2, even though
I try to avoid using them myself, including large "enterprise" hosting
services.
(I'd love to be pushing to PHP 5.4 faster, but the lag time for
distributions and hosts is painful.)
--Larry Garfield
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
