Am 27.03.13 13:41, schrieb Jordi Boggiano:
> On 27.03.2013 13:18, Lars Strojny wrote:
>> Not really, as an interface guarantees behavior, which is not possible for 
>> DateTimeImmutable and DateTime.
> 
> The interface could be a subset of DateTime public methods, including
> only the readonly ones.
> 
> I can't imagine how this could possibly be named in a sane way though :/

DateTimeInterface or DateTimeROInterface?

Cheers
> 
> Cheers
> 


-- 
                                                              ,,,
                                                             (o o)
+---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl                                                       |
| mailto:andr...@heigl.org                  N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" |
| http://andreas.heigl.org                       http://hei.gl/wiFKy7 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://hei.gl/root-ca                                               |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift

Reply via email to