On 1 May 2013 14:55, Rasmus Schultz <ras...@mindplay.dk> wrote:

> Then why are you not convincing them first to get them on board as support
>> for your proposal.
>
>
> It's not a proposal yet - I didn't want to write a lengthy RFC just to
> learn that all I had was a brainfart, or that everyone was going to be
> totally opposed. Having the discussion here surfaced a ton of questions
> that (so far) indicate (to me) that this might be a good idea, and also
> helps me address all of those questions if I do end up writing an RFC.
>
> If you think gathering the information in an RFC is the next logical step,
> I will try to find the time :-)
>
>
I think that 1) you might as well start the work now, both to give people a
place to get an overview of the discussion and to gather up the questions
of which there are already a few, and that 2) if you don't start by
reaching out to your indicated main audience (frameworks) then you won't
get the support the idea needs. Also, 3) as your indicated audience is
frameworks they will presumably have a lot of feedback - including your
basic "no we don't need this" or "this would be awesome".

Note that I don't think frameworks would necessarily be the sole audience
for this - I just think your time would be better spent taking the idea
there first.

Regards
Peter

-- 
<hype>
WWW: plphp.dk / plind.dk
CV: careers.stackoverflow.com/peterlind
LinkedIn: plind
Twitter: kafe15
</hype>

Reply via email to