On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Peter Cowburn <petercowb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 18 June 2013 18:24, Sherif Ramadan <theanomaly...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Nevertheless, I'd say go with a new array_filter_key() function, because >> > that permits using existing one-parameter functions like that strlen as >> a >> > callback, instead of forcing two-parameter callback functions. >> > >> The current patch does not force the callback to take two arguments. By >> default the existing behavior is maintained since the third argument is >> false by default. I still don't hear a good argument for adding a new >> function. > > > I'm very much on the "new function" side of the fence. Basic (one-word) > arguments for this include familiarity and simplicity. > Are you saying that it's better to have familiarity over functionality? I'm not sure I agree with this premise of we shouldn't provide better functionality just because it would make all the other poorly written functions look bad. That's setting a lower bar of standards, isn't it? > Familiarity, since we're used to *_key functions for arrays. It will come > as absolutely no surprise to see the _key function spring up out of nowhere > and its use is blindingly obvious for anyone who has ever used > array_filter(). Simplicity since, err.. what were those flags again? is it > $key first or $value? is there an ARRAY_FILTER_BOTH? Also, I don't pretend > my time with PHP covers everything that everyone has ever done or wanted to > do, but I cannot think of a time when I wanted to filter an array on both > the key *and* the value at the same time: of course, it's easy to make up > use cases. >
