Hi! > Assuming you mean call_user_func_array, yes. This is just syntax sugar > for call_user_func_array. Advantages of this syntax over cufa are > outlined here: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/argument_unpacking#advantages_over_call_user_func_array
The only case that I see that could make sense is $db->query($query, ...$params). Multiple unpackings make no sense to me, as it is impossible to know which argument ends up where and no corresponding syntax exists on function side. Also, no other language as far as I can see allows it. Also, I just noticed the RFC tries to sneak in the exception throwing in the syntax construct, which we agreed not to do a long time ago and which was never done in the engine. We shouldn't do this - if you want to change PHP error handling, it should be in separate RFC for this purpose. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
