Hey: On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > I'm trying to work through some of the more subtle changes in phpng and > one that sticks out is the loss of IS_BOOL. I think the explanation is > that it removes a read, but while I'm only seeing a few uses of is_bool > across the codebase, every one of them is used simply to convert the > bool value into some other format. Surely what would make more sense > here is simply to make the type_flag either true or false, and retain > the IS_BOOL as a single identifiable type? Having two types both > indicating 'bool' just seems wrong. there is a _IS_BOOL macro to identifiable bool type..
you can use it in your own codes. thanks > > -- > Lester Caine - G8HFL > ----------------------------- > Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact > L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk > EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ > Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk > Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- Laruence Xinchen Hui http://www.laruence.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
