On 8/22/14, 10:46 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > In other words, it would be nice to see more developers actually > porting extensions to realize the amount of changes are introduced by > NG and by the int64. The sooner is in order of magnitude must larger. > It is not a bad comment, only a fact. Given that, before we choose to > say that it is fine for one part to change APIs/Macros signatures or > names and not for another, we should really get a better view of what > has actually changed. And how we can deal with our old habit to > maintain one tree for many major PHP versions. For many extensions, I > do not think it will be possible, or with unreadable code with 2-3x > more #ifdef all over the place.
I knew you would make this comparison. I am willing to suffer porting pain if it gets me a 20% performance boost. I am completely unwilling to suffer any porting pain because Pierre has decided he doesn't like the names of some macros. -Rasmus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
