On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Mike Dugan <m...@mjdugan.com> wrote:

>
> On October 14, 2014 at 9:31:15 AM, Andrea Faulds (a...@ajf.me) wrote:
>
>
> On 14 Oct 2014, at 14:27, Kristopher <kristopherwil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > $_HTTP_REQUEST_BODY and $_HTTP_QUERY_STRING for nostalgia's sake.
>
> Ew, non-superglobals.
>
> But $_REQUEST_BODY and $_QUERY_STRING are a bit lengthy. Perhaps $_QUERY
> (for $_GET) and $_BODY (for $_POST)? Then the variable set finally makes
> sense, but isn’t too long:
>
> * $_QUERY - query string parameters
> * $_BODY - request body parameters
> * $_REQUEST - query string and request body parameters
>
> Makes more sense than $_GET and $_POST.
>
> Any objections?
>
> --
> Andrea Faulds
> http://ajf.me/
>
>
> +1 for this. This would hopefully also eliminate the confusion for new
> developers (or not-so-new developers) who don’t quite understand that $_GET
> and $_POST don’t strictly relate to their HTTP verbs of the same name.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dugan
>
> m...@mjdugan.com
>

That could work, though the BC breakage will be extreme.  I'm not sure if
that's worth it even in a major version increment.  On the other hand,
making $_PUT and $_DELETE available wouldn't break anything and wouldn't
require re-training for devs.

--Kris

Reply via email to