On 2014-10-26, Bob Weinand <bobw...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Am 26.10.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk>: >> >> On 26/10/14 15:41, Bob Weinand wrote: >>> Ask them at PhpStorm. They were pleased to not have to use DBGp for it. >>> They just initially requested it because they didn’t knew any better >>> protocol. That’s all. >> >> PHPStorm like PHP-FIG have their own agendas which do not play well with >> other groups of developers. Just because one thinks an idea is good does >> not mean that everybody else has to adopt it. So what becomes 'main >> stream' has to have common consensus and the voting rules provide that. >> >> When was the vote on this rework taken? >> >> -- >> Lester Caine - G8HFL >> ----------------------------- >> Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact >> L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk >> EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ >> Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk >> Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk > > There wasn’t any vote and there won’t. > > /dev/null likes to listen to your complaints why we should have voted on it.
step back a bit here, stay professional, there is no need for passive aggressiveness. > > But now it’s in, let’s rather try to improve what’s there than screaming for > a vote - it won’t help anyone and hinder possible work on improving the > current thing. >From what I see, the complan is about the initial protocol and not about how to improve it or not. This whole protocol business needed an RFC, which I haven't seen. So we should come up with a good way of deciding which protocol to use and how to implement it. Before this, I would strongly vote to not incldue the current verison in PHP 7 at all. Also let me point out that the code belogns to everyone and everyone will have to deal with it so we better make an informed decision now. Thanks -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
