Hey:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > Hi! > > We’re now half-way through voting on this RFC, and only three people, two if > I’m excluded, have voted. I realise it’s a rather technical and obscure > matter, but I am a little worried by how few people have voted so far. Three > votes is hardly enough to justify a change. the current warning message is :" expects parameter 1 to be long, double given in %s on line %d" but maybe it should be something like: "expects parameter 1 to be long, double(which is beyond long range) given in %s on line %d"? since it's not the fault of double self, right? thanks > > If you missed the original announcement, hopefully this reminder will reach > you. Here it is, repeated: > >> On 2 Dec 2014, at 21:44, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: >> >> I’m putting the ZPP Failure on Overflow RFC to a vote. This RFC is an >> important prerequisite to the Big Integer Support RFC, as it ensures safety >> in implicit integer parameter conversions. >> >> The RFC requires a 2/3 majority, and voting starts today (2014-12-02) and >> ends in 10 days’ time next Friday (2014-12-12). >> >> Please read the RFC carefully. If you have any doubts or queries about the >> RFC, please don’t hesitate to ask me. >> >> The RFC and voting widget can be found here: >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/zpp_fail_on_overflow > > Thanks! > > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ > > > > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- Xinchen Hui @Laruence http://www.laruence.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
