On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This issue has been reported earlier on [email protected] and is being
> > discussed and analyzed. It is not a simple task.
> >
>
> If we are not going to use other hash (i.e. half MD4 like other langs), how
> about
> add max allowed collisions? It would be simple and fast enough. I'm not
> looking
> at the code, so I could be wrong.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Yasuo Ohgaki
> [email protected]
>

I think it would be nice also keeping the hash replacement on the table,
otherwise we will just continue the current trend (to fix/work around the
immediate problem, only to resurface later in a different form).

-- 
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

Reply via email to