Hey:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote: > Hi Xinchen, > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Xinchen Hui <larue...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Feb 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Rasmus, >> > >> >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Having just finished porting php-memcached (with help from Xinchen) to >> >> PHP7 I was wondering if it wouldn't be worthwhile to annotate the diff >> >> and explain why each change was made. The extension is complicated >> >> enough to cover most of the changes the bulk of extension authors need >> >> to worry about. >> >> >> >> The diff is easy enough to grab: >> >> >> >> git clone https://github.com/php-memcached-dev/php-memcached.git >> >> cd php-memcached >> >> git checkout php7 >> >> git diff master php7 >> >> >> >> It looks like this: >> >> >> >> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/15cbc9947edb4f0a71fd >> > >> > It uses session save handler uses PS_MOD() which is legacy. >> > I may help to adopt PS_MOD_TIMESTAMP(). >> > It eliminates writes and boost session performance a lot if apps >> > do not update session data always. >> > >> nice，thanks >> btw did you bench your optimization on file handler against Wordpress? > > > No I don't, but I have some numbers. > > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1016 > > ----------------------------------------------- > I've tried to get some benchmarks. It seems current system is too fast to > get obvious performance difference. > > Test command: ab -c 7 -n 500000 http://localhost:8888/session.php > Test script: > > <?php > ini_set('session.save_path', '/home/tmp'); > ini_set('session.lazy_write', 1); // Change mode here > ini_set('session.use_strict_mode', 0); > > session_id('testid'); > session_start(['read_and_close'=>0]); // Change mode here > //$_SESSION['test'] = ++$_SESSION['test']; > $_SESSION['a'] = str_repeat('a', 102400); > echo '<pre>'; > var_dump(session_id(), $_SESSION['test']); > > > Old behavior was around 15000 reqs/sec. > "read_and_close" improved it to about 20000 reqs/sec. i.e 33% faster. > "lazy_write" did not improve # of reqs, but per process httpd disk writes > was reduced from 100 MB/s to 5 MB/s. i.e. There were 12 httpd processes, > 1200 MB/s writes was reduced to 60 MB/s writes. > > I think this would be good enough benchmark for merging. > ----------------------------------------------- > > As you can see, lazy_write didn't improve files much. The reason is my > current Linux > kernel already does lazy_write for files aren't changed. I'm using Fedora 21 > x86_64. > > However, per process writes are reduced from 1200MB/s to 60MB/s writes. > 60MB/s > writes includes writes to log. This means network traffic will be reduced. > It should > help many apps use memcached save handler. > I've benched wordpress, didn't see any obviously speedup. thanks > Regards, > > -- > Yasuo Ohgaki > yohg...@ohgaki.net -- Xinchen Hui @Laruence http://www.laruence.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
