Hi Joe, On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Joe Watkins <pthre...@pthreads.org> wrote:
> I'm not sure we can always enforce invariant contracts ... > > Evaluating invariant expressions on entry and exit is not enough, since a > property can be changed without the use of a method. > > Can or should, we do anything about that ? > > This should also be covered in the RFC, I think. > One reason I would like to use __invariant() is to allow overriding parents. I think we should have way for it, but I don't have good idea now. I'm still thinking. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
