Hi, 2015-02-13 14:45 GMT+01:00 Thomas Punt <tp...@hotmail.co.uk>: > Hi Francois, > >> From: franc...@tekwire.net> >> May I suggest to extend your proposal to is_null() with the same logic ? > If we were to do the same with is_null(), then would it not be best to do it > with all the is_*() functions? I would be more than happy to cater for those > functions as well, though their usages seem a lot less common. What does > everyone else think?
While I don't know how common such a usage is I'm certain that there is a use case for it. However, just modifying a subset of the is_* functions sounds like a bad idea. If such a change is applied it should be done to all type related is_* functions and be similar to issets behavior (return false if at least one argument is not of the given type). Thanks, -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
