On 16/02/15 12:36, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> yes. like it was proposed at
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reflection_doccomment_annotations#list_of_methods_to_implement

Awesome. I would +1 for sure!

Cheers,

>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Cesar Rodas <ce...@rodas.me
> <mailto:ce...@rodas.me>> wrote:
>
>
>     On 16/02/15 12:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>>     you already have doc-block. nothing should be done in PHP core,
>>     but you have to parse it yourself.
>>     The goal of annotations is to provide standard and powerful way.
>>     On the other hand standard PHP expression syntax may be not
>>     enough for all cases.
>
>     Agreed on that. I just thought it could be wise parse natively
>     what is already out there. Anyways adapt our DocBlock annotation
>     parsers to parse both (native PHP annotations and docblocks)
>     shouldn't be that hard either.
>
>     As far as I see annotations are supposed to be accessed through
>     reflections right? Or will it do something automatically as in Python?
>
>     Cheers,
>
>
>>
>>     Thanks. Dmitry.
>>
>>     On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Cesar Rodas <ce...@rodas.me
>>     <mailto:ce...@rodas.me>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>         On 16/02/15 12:19, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>>         > I decided to explain the proposed annotation syntax "in
>>         words" to avoid
>>         > misunderstanding
>>         >
>>         > annotations ::= { annotation }.
>>         > annotation   ::= '<' STRING '>' | '<' STRING '(' expr ')' '>'.
>>         >
>>         > where <expr> is regular PHP expression.
>>         Why not doc-block annotations? So it can be parse/understand
>>         that is
>>         already there (Doctrine annotations for instance).
>>
>>         >
>>         > Thanks. Dmitry.
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Dmitry Stogov
>>         <dmi...@zend.com <mailto:dmi...@zend.com>> wrote:
>>         >
>>         >> hi,
>>         >>
>>         >> During discussion of different ways of implementing
>>         "Design by Contract"
>>         >> we got an idea of using annotations.
>>         >>
>>         >> BTW: annotations are useful by their own and may be used
>>         for different
>>         >> purposes. Support for annotations was proposed long time ago:
>>         >>
>>         >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations
>>         >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations-in-docblock
>>         >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reflection_doccomment_annotations
>>         >>
>>         >> HHVM already implemented similar concept
>>         >>
>>         >> http://docs.hhvm.com/manual/en/hack.attributes.php
>>         >>
>>         >> I made a quick and dirty PoC that shows how we may
>>         implement annotations
>>         >> in PHP7 and how powerful they may be :
>>         >> https://gist.github.com/dstogov/dbf2a8f46e43719bd2c2
>>         >>
>>         >> The test there is self explainable. Of course, annotations
>>         just provide a
>>         >> way to add metadata, but doesn't define attribute names or
>>         the ways they
>>         >> are going to be used. Only Reflection API to read.
>>         >>
>>         >> There are still a lot of technical problems that have to
>>         be solved.
>>         >> Right now, we just need to answer a question - if we like
>>         this in PHP7?
>>         >> Thought and opinions are welcome...
>>         >>
>>         >> Thanks. Dmitry.
>>         >>
>>
>>         --
>>         César D. Rodas
>>         Open Source developer
>>         +595-983-161124
>>         PGP: F9ED A265 A3AB C8A1 D145 7368 158A 0336 C707 0AA6
>>
>>
>>
>
>     -- 
>     César D. Rodas
>     Open Source developer
>     +595-983-161124
>     PGP: F9ED A265 A3AB C8A1 D145 7368 158A 0336 C707 0AA6
>
>

-- 
César D. Rodas
Open Source developer
+595-983-161124
PGP: F9ED A265 A3AB C8A1 D145 7368 158A 0336 C707 0AA6

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to