On 17/02/15 15:30, François Laupretre wrote: >> Returning 'not-zero/empty' as true and 'zero' as false is one of the >> > natural things to use in PHP and I don't think any other language has >> > that flexibility? > You didn't read it right. > > I was talking of conversions *from* bool, not *to* bool. (int -> bool) is > fine and will be preserved, but I propose to remove (bool -> int). You will > still return numbers as bool, and non-zero will still be converted to true. > Relax :)
My current practice up until now has been to use 'return false' when an action failed, but the main return would be a number of records or string of data. So you are now blocking that activity ... I'm reading to right, but you are not thinking all possibilities through. But I think I'm starting to see it broken already with the other changes to the core :( I'm not returning 'IS_FALSE' so I'm probably going to have to change the 'false' to '0' anyway so as to avoid the bool? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
