On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Dan Ackroyd <dan...@basereality.com> wrote: > On 19 March 2015 at 17:14, François Laupretre <franc...@php.net> wrote: > >> As you may have noticed if you had a look at the RFC or twitter, I have >> decided to follow people's suggestion. >> Please note that the switch from E_DEPRECATED to fatal error won't require >> any new RFC/discussion/vote >> as the fatal error is considered as approved. I just introduce an >> E_DEPRECATED phase for 7.0. > > You edited the RFC after the voting had closed? You are not allowed to > edit an RFC after the voting has occurred. > Agreed. I hereby change my vote from 'Yes' to 'No' in protest of this action.
> For now, please revert the changes your made to the RFC after it had > been closed. > Please. If we need to change the schedule, let that be a separate RFC. > And whoever has the power to remove karma, please take > the power to edit RFCs away from Francois once that has been done. > Now that's a bit heavy-handed. Let's call this a slap on the wrist and move on. -Sara -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
