On May 22, 2015 7:20 AM, "Stanislav Malyshev" <smalys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > I'd like to add "void" to this list, so we have the option to introduce
a
> > void return type in PHP 7.x. I've seen some disagreement as to whether
this
>
> I think this type makes no sense in PHP, but I don't object to having
> note in the docs for people not to name their classes "void" (not that
> there's any reason to do it anyway...). I strongly object to introducing
> any changes in the code though - warnings, etc.

The problem I see with any kind of additional soft reserved words is that
it opens the door to actually reserve them in 7.x. And this is a way more
bigger problem.

If anything, I would rather extend or agree on a BC definitions RFC to
avoid such possible breaks in x.y+1 releases.

Cheers,
Pierre

Reply via email to