Hi Anatol, On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol....@belski.net> wrote:
> Changing E_ERROR to E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is probably ok where it is safe, > but changing E_WARNING to E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is a BC break. I agree it's BC. E_ERROR does not give users a chance for graceful script termination and E_WARNING is used instead. This is the only reason why E_WARNING is used before. However, users may continue execution with the default setting. I think it's not good to continue with fatal setting errors, but I don't mind changing these errors back to E_WARNING. It's your call. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net