On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi! > > > The effort to create and adopt a CoC is minimal and the benefits are > > huge. It creates, confirms or ensure that the context of the php.net > > remains a safe for anyone to contribute. > > It also provides a way for 5 (or, since CoC mechanisms are not specified > at all, even 3 assuming CoC decides by majority) people to accuse any > member of the community of some pretty dark things (without even having > to provide any substantial proof) and immediately ban them from all the > community spaces with no ability to explain or counter. I don't think > this is a good idea, especially when nobody actually thinks we need such > draconian measures for anything at all that actually happened. > -- > Stas Malyshev > smalys...@gmail.com > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > currently I (and a bunch of other people) could revoke anybody's karma, how is this any different(ofc. it would be reverted and I would get a scolding)? we just have to make the process transparent and as mentioned in the RFC any permanent action would require an RFC and consensus from the project: "f the CoC team determines that a longer temporary ban or a permanent ban is necessary, they shall institute a temporary ban and raise an RFC to the general project to effect the desired ban. Once the RFC is issued, the temporary ban's lifetime will be tied to the RFC's lifetime (will expire when the vote is finished)." I don't see that as a problem, on the contrary, there would be somebody to ask for an official statement when somebody tries to slander someone else with bogus reports/claims. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
