On 14/06/2016 20:11, Leigh wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 at 22:30 Matthew Browne <mbrown...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
What is the proper way to express support for an item that's not an
official part of an RFC but is listed as an idea for future
consideration? Specifically I wanted to give my "+1" for covariant
return types which are mentioned in passing in this RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/return_types.
I think you'd go ahead and create an RFC for it :)
In this particular instance, it may be more to the point to create an
*implementation* of it.
The reason it was omitted was not for lack of desire, but due to
practical problems of how to make it work. See for instance
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=142791636808421&w=2
Regards,
--
Rowan Collins
[IMSoP]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php