On 4 February 2017 at 00:04, Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Scott Arciszewski <sc...@paragonie.com> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote: > > > > > Hi Scott and all, > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Scott Arciszewski <sc...@paragonie.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> I've opened the vote for the libsodium RFC. > > >> > > >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/libsodium > > >> > > >> See https://externals.io/thread/626 for the previous discussion > topics. > > >> > > >> The vote closes at 21:00 UTC (4 PM Eastern Time) next Friday. > > >> > > > > > > I voted for "No, sodium_foo" syntax in order to be consistent with > > > existing procedural APIs. > > > 2/3 majority wouldn't fit nicely. What it would be if vote result is > 51% > > > vs 49%? > > > More than half is good enough for 2nd vote choice. IMO. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > -- > > > Yasuo Ohgaki > > > yohg...@ohgaki.net > > > > > > > > I like \Sodium\foo instead of sodium_foo, but it deviates from the norm. > > If we're going to break the norm, we should do so on a stronger > majority > > than 50%+1. > > > > Also, I thought the rules changed so *_everything_* needed 2/3 now? > > > > The usual rule is that "secondary" votes use 50% majority, to avoid bias in > one direction or the other. > > Regards, > Nikita > Would it not be possible for _both_ to be supported? It would be just an alias
