2017-05-29 22:00 GMT+02:00 Jakub Zelenka <[email protected]>: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Niklas Keller <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Morning Internals, >> >> I have updated the RFC to use a "min_signature_bits" setting instead. >> >> > Wouldn't be better use security levels instead as it is in OpenSSL? Of > course I mean just for sig level to not re-implement everything. Basically > having sig_level or something like that... >
As we can't use the OpenSSL implementation directly, I don't see any reason to use arbitrary integers there which you have to look up again. Maybe we should fine a totally different way. Regards, Niklas
