On 24.08.2017 at 00:06, Adam Baratz wrote:

>> That change was implemented in the SQLite3 extension without a RFC, so I'm
>> quite confused here.
> 
> My literal reading of the contribution guide[1] is that new features should
> be preceded by an RFC, though there are certainly cases where this doesn't
> happen. I don't have a clear enough understanding of this community to say
> when RFCs can be skipped. I'm not sure who the authority would be. The
> release manager for the next minor rev? Anyone with commit privileges?

It seems to me this is rather simple: if a feature is uncontroversial,
it doesn't need an RFC.  Since nobody objected against PR #2528, it was
merged (after some weeks).  However, there have been objections against
PR #2698, so an RFC appears to be appropriate.

-- 
Christoph M. Becker

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to