On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Rowan Collins wrote: > On 30/10/2017 03:14, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > > The vote for this should have ended......3 days ago. > > > > At which point I believe the vote was actually passing. > > > Hm, that's awkward! > > For the record: > > - voting was announced on the evening of the 9th "for two weeks" which would > imply the evening of the 23rd > - however, the e-mail also said "Vote will end on Wednesday the 25th of > October. " > - the wiki page states "Vote closing on Oct 27, 2017." > - https://php-rfc-watch.beberlei.de/ lists "daverandom" voting No at > 2017-10-28T07:28:00+0000 (*mutters something about relative date display being > uselessly vague*) > > It's possible that daverandom was several hours west of Greenwich at the time > (e.g. in North America), where it was still late on October 27th. So taking > the latest of the three published closing dates, and applying the most > generous time zone, it's possible that all the votes were valid. > > It's certainly clear that no *new* votes should be counted. > > The last vote before that according to the rfc-watch tool was "salathe" on the > 21st, so if daverandom's vote is *not* valid, the RFC passes 7:6; however, if > daverandom's vote *is* valid, we have 7:7, and the RFC is declined.
7:6 is technically not "50%"+1. 50% of 13 is 6½, and 7 is not higher than 6½ + 1. :-) cheers, Derick -- https://derickrethans.nl | https://xdebug.org | https://dram.io Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: https://xdebug.org/donate.php twitter: @derickr and @xdebug
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
