On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:19 PM Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 01.08.2018 at 20:29, Pedro Magalhães wrote: > > If anyone finds some value in having something like this and wishes to > > revive our instance, I'd be glad to help setting it up. If we feel that > > Travis + Appveyor are enough, that's fine too :) > > Well, on further consideration it seems that having our own CI would be > nice, especially if we'd run further test suites or different > configurations there. On the other hand, someone would actually to have > a look at the test results, and act on failing tests. Any volunteers? > > -- > Christoph M. Becker > I'd say that if we want this, then it should be integrated with github and be a third check (next to travis and appveyor). Depending on the stability, it could be a required or an optional check. This would be better than expecting someone to manually check it. Regards, Pedro
