Sorry, forgot to CC the following mail to internals:
Am 24-Jan-2019 14:28:43 +0100 schrieb nikita....@gmail.com:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 2:15 PM <naitsi...@e.mail.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 13:27 Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi internals,
> > >
> > > I'd like to propose a new custom object serialization mechanism intended
> > > to
> > > replace the broken Serializable interface:
> > >
> > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/custom_object_serialization
> > >
> > > This was already previously discussed in
> > > https://externals.io/message/98834,
> > > this just brings it into RFC form. The latest motivation for this is
> > > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=77302, a compatibility issue in 7.3
> > > affecting Symfony, caused by Serializable. We can't fix Serializable, but
> > > we can at least make sure that a working alternative exists.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Nikita
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > What happens if both `__serialize()` and `__wakeup()` are implemented?
>
> You mean if there are just those two methods, but not __unserialize() for
> example?
> In that case the array returned by __serialize() will be unserialized as
> object
> properties and __wakeup() will be called for finalization. In principle it's
> okay to
> use this combination, though it would be somewhat unusual.
Sorry, what I wanted to ask was, what happens if `__serialize()` and
`__SLEEP()` are implemented? xD
Here's an example:
class A {
private $foo = 'foo';
private $bar = 'bar';
function __serialize() {
return ['foo' => $this->foo];
}
function __sleep() {
return ['bar'];
}
}
echo serialize(new A());
What will be the output of the above snippet?
>
> > And another idea for the naming: Maybe one could use `__normalize()` and
> > `__denormalize()`. Because the methods do not serialize themself, like the
> > normalizer in the Symfony serializer component.
>
> I'd like that "serialization" appears in some form in the name, to make clear
> in what context this is used. Normalization is a fairly general term and
> could refer to any number of things.
>
> Nikita
Yes, you are right. It is just, that my personal taste for function names is
that they should describe what they do. New users may be irritated about the
function name.
Maybe a more explicit name would be `__toSerializable`.
But I have no idea for the counterpart ^^
Best regards,
Christian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FreeMail powered by mail.de - MEHR SICHERHEIT, SERIOSITÄT UND KOMFORT
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
