On 25/03/2019 16:38, Andrey Andreev wrote: > > OK, so why not flip it and make it always available instead? I'm aware > of the potential XML conflict, but I've personally never seen it, so > to me that looks like the lesser evil compared to a massive BC break.
I slightly lean towards removing support for '<?', but in contrast, I've seen `echo '<?xml'` quite a lot due to fear of short_open_tags. -- Regards, Mike
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature