Hello, the underlaying discussion here is more important; than just voting yes or no on uncompleted hamiltonian graphs; the real question here does php8 will be a break thru; meaning bugger off the mistakes of the past or a continuation of them; until this RCF does not happen; I would say nothing interesting will ever happen.
Have a good day. On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:25 AM Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 3:56 AM Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Can't say I understand your position here. Don't want to change the > > ternary from left-associative to right-associative? I can understand > that: > > Silent behavior changes are always problematic. This is not what the RFC > > proposes though. > > > > Did the RFC change since introduction? I may have been looking at a stale > load of the page (opened it up awhile ago and only just got around to > responding). > > As for what it says atm, I still think it goes too far. the warning in 7.4 > I can support, but I'm not a fan of breaking existing code on a feature > that's this old. Ratchet up the warning in 8.0 if you'd like, but error is > further than I'm willing to go on this one. > > > > 20 years of code in the wild has not "accepted that fact and moved on". > If > > a left-associative ternary is used, it is almost certainly a bug. If > people > > use this structure by accident (because it is familiar from other > > programming languages), I'd like them to get an error instead of having > to > > figure out why their obviously correct code is not working or, in the > worse > > case, just leave behind buggy code. > > > > I'm on dismal wifi at the moment, else I'd do some searches, but do you > have any examples of code in the wild subject to this bug? > I agree it's a lousy state, but it's not emergent. > > -Sara >
