*NEW LAWS - DUBAI LAND DEPARTMENT*

* *

*19 April 2009*
ABU DHABI - The Dubai Land Department is planning to issue an amended
property law that will determine refunds for investors who default on their
payments based on construction progress of the project, according to lawyers
briefed on the matter.

The move will bring clarity to the property market in Dubai, where a credit
squeeze and the effects of the global financial crisis have led to defaults
by home buyers. But some investors have criticised the amendment for being
too heavily in favour of developers.

Lawyers say the amendment to article 11 of Dubai Law 13 of 2008 will
stipulate that in cases where a buyer defaults and the developer has
constructed at least 80 per cent of the project, the buyer loses all money
paid to that point. The home can then be auctioned to compensate the
developer for the rest of the cost.

If a developer has completed at least 60 per cent of the project and the
buyer defaults, the developer is entitled to keep 40 per cent of the
purchase price.

But if a developer has completed less than 60 per cent of the project, it
can only keep 25 per cent of the purchase price.

If the developer has not been able to start construction "without any
negligence or omission on the developer's part", the developer may keep 30
per cent of the money paid by the buyer to that point.

Developers would have to refund any money due to the purchaser within one
year, or within 60 days of the resale of the home.

A legal briefing from the law firm Clyde & Co said the amendment "provides
much anticipated clarification regarding the procedures required to be
followed by developers in respect of defaulting purchasers, as well as the
rights of developers to retain purchaser monies upon cancellation".

The original law specified that if a buyer defaulted on payments to the
developer, the buyer would be able to recover 70 per cent of any money they
had turned over to that point.

But when the property market started to face difficulties last autumn, the
Real Estate Regulatory Agency (RERA) issued an interpretation of the law
that said the developer could retain 30 per cent of the total price of the
property. In some cases, this meant the developer could keep all payments a
buyer had made to them.

Officials from RERA later admitted that the interpretation was an emergency
measure intended to prevent a wave of defaults that would cripple the
property sector.

The new amendment, called Dubai Law No. 9 of 2009, will not only provide
more specific terms but be retroactive for all property contracts signed in
Dubai. If a contract between a buyer and a developer has a contrary clause,
it will be rendered void, according to the Clyde & Co briefing.

Emad Eldin Farouq, a senior legal counsel with the Dubai Land Department,
told a panel last week that the amendment had been signed into law and would
soon be published in the official gazette of Dubai, according to an article
in Xpress, which first reported the story. The amendment would "maintain the
confidence of investors and safeguard the real estate of Dubai", Mr Farouq
said, according to Xpress.

But some investors said the amendment did not go far enough in protecting
investors from developers who had delayed construction indefinitely.

"It is taking away our rights from the way the law was originally written,"
said Nigel Knight, a homebuyer and member of the Dubai Property Investors
Group.

The investors' group handed the Land Department a petition last week asking
for a meeting to discuss concerns it has with the amendment.

A Dubai Land Department spokesman could not be reached yesterday.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Investors Club Dubai" group.
To post to this group, send email to investors-club-dubai@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
investors-club-dubai+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/investors-club-dubai?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to