On Nov 25, 2012, at 11:33 PM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: > Hi Kumar, > Can you please apply this patch. > > Regards > Varun
Was waiting on the others to apply this all together. (ie getting an Ack from Joerg, and follow comments from Timur to be resolved) - k > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sethi Varun-B16395 >> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 7:25 PM >> To: joerg.roe...@amd.com; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linuxppc- >> d...@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; >> Tabi Timur-B04825 >> Cc: Sethi Varun-B16395 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/4 v2] iommu/fsl: Store iommu domain information pointer >> in archdata. >> >> Add a new field in the device (powerpc) archdata structure for storing >> iommu domain information pointer. This pointer is stored when the device >> is attached to a particular domain. >> >> Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi <varun.se...@freescale.com> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/device.h | 4 ++++ >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/device.h >> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/device.h >> index 77e97dd..6dc79fe 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/device.h >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/device.h >> @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ struct dev_archdata { >> void *iommu_table_base; >> } dma_data; >> >> + /* IOMMU domain information pointer. This would be set >> + * when this device is attached to an iommu_domain. >> + */ >> + void *iommu_domain; >> #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB >> dma_addr_t max_direct_dma_addr; >> #endif >> -- >> 1.7.4.1 > _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu