On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 01:52:57PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 28 November 2014 13:29:38 Will Deacon wrote: > > Here is v5 of the patches I've previously sent here: > > > > RFCv1: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-August/283023.html > > RFCv2: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-September/283752.html > > RFCv3: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-September/287031.html > > RFCv4: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/302711.html > > > > Changes since RFCv4 include: > > > > - Dropped the RFC tag, since has been used by a couple of people now > > > > - Dropped the DMA segment configuration from of_dma_configure, as there > > appear to be assumptions about 64k segments elsewhere in the kernel > > > > - Added acks/tested-bys (thanks to everybody who reviewed the series) > > > > - A few small fixes for issues found by Marek > > > > Arnd: Is this too late for 3.19? We could merge the first 6 patches > > with no issues, since there aren't any callers of of_iommu_init > > without patch 7 anyway. > > > > Up to you. > > I think this looks great overall. My only feedback is the exact same > comment that Joerg already made: > > On Friday 28 November 2014 14:03:36 jroe...@suse.de wrote: > > Hmm, I don't like the idea of storing private data in iommu_ops. But > > given that this is already an improvement we can build on later, here is > > my > > > > Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de> > > > > To further improve this we should probably introduce a seperate > > iommu-descriptor data-structure later which then describes a single > > hardware iommu device. > > so I second that and add my > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Yup, I'll take a look at that as part of a separate series, since I really want to have different pgsize_bitmaps anyway. > Now, who should merge this series? I think someone should put all eight > patches into linux-next now, and if something goes wrong with the last > two, then we skip them for 3.19. I think it makes most sense to go via arm-soc, but we'd need rmk's ack on the last two patches. Russell, are you ok with that plan? Will _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
